Risk Assessment
On the 1st of January 1993 the Manual Handling Operations
Regulations came into force. The Regulations are made under the Health and
Safety at Work etc Act 1974 (the HSW Act). They implement European Directive
90/269/EEC on the manual handling of loads; supplement the general duties
placed on employers and others by the HSW Act and the broad requirements of
the Management of Health and Safety at Work Regulations 1992; and replace
a number of earlier, outdated legal provisions.
Regulation 4(1)(b)(i) requires that -
Each employer shall-
where it is not reasonably practicable to avoid the need for his employees
to undertake any manual handling operations at work which involve a risk of
being injured -
(i) make a suitable and sufficient assessment of all
such manual handling operations to be undertaken by them, having regard to
the factors which are specified in column 1 of schedule 1 to these Regulations
and considering the questions which are specified in the corresponding entry
in column 2 of that schedule.
Source: Manual Handling Operations Regulations 1992,
HSE, ISBN 0-7176-2415-3
Why Assessment?
Over the last twenty years or so there has been a considerable
amount of research carried out in leading industrialised nations in an attempt
to clarify what men and women can handle safely. Although this research is
continuing what it has clearly shown is that there are many factors that interact
when a manual task is carried out. The way in which these factors interact
depend upon the type of manual operation carried out, and the manner in which
it is carried out. For example, the stresses within the body vary with rate
of application of force - is the force exerted quickly or slowly? - and with
the bodily posture adopted. What may be 'safe' when carried out slowly and
smoothly may be likely to cause injury when carried out jerkily and quickly
in an unstable position. What may be 'safe' with the back in an erect position
may be dangerous when stooping over. A given force may be acceptable if it
is applied only once during the working day, but be likely to cause injury
if it has to be applied repeatedly. One worker may be twice as strong as another.
For all these reasons, and others it is not possible to lay down maximum weights
or forces, nor can definitive guidance be given to cover every eventuality.
However, there is sufficient research knowledge to allow generally applicable
criteria to be established on safe handling capacities.
It's easier Than You Think
Many employers find the prospect of carrying out a
thorough risk assessment a daunting one. It need not be if it is approached
in a planned and methodical manner. It is worth pointing out that nobody knows
your business like you do, therefore the knowledge is already in place. It
is just a matter of applying the new-found knowledge of correct manual handling
techniques to your particular working environment. It should also be pointed
out that, despite the requirement to avoid where reasonably practicable, the
vast majority of tasks will be able to be reduced in risk only. With a little
thought and cooperation most loads will be able to be made 'safer'. The bottom
line reality though is that life and work carry risks, however, if the exercise
did reduce the likelihood of back injury then it will more than have served
its purpose and may well prove to be one of the most cost effective exercises
you have ever undertaken.
D-I-Y
As training providers and risk assessors of many years
standing we are firmly of the view that if the job is to be carried out 'in-house'
an absolutely essential prerequisite is to ensure that the staff involved
are fully trained in correct manual handling techniques. All skilled workers
will know how to perform the task per se, but to do that same job applying
correct manual handling methods is another matter. It is rather like being
asked to evaluate a new vehicle or piece of equipment. If the assessor can
neither drive nor operate the equipment little will be achieved.
What's Involved?
To give you an idea of what needs to be considered
when carrying out risk assessment the following may be useful. Essentially
the risk assessment should look at four keys elements, the task, the load,
the working environment and individual capability. When looking at the task
one should consider the following. Is the load held or manipulated at a distance
from the trunk, does it involve twisting, stooping or reaching upwards? Are
excessive lifting, lowering or carrying distances involved? Is pushing or
pulling an element of the task and is there a risk of sudden or unpredictable
movement? Is the work rate imposed by a process requiring frequent or prolonged
physical effort with insufficient rest or recovery periods? Do operatives
perform team handling or do they handle while seated? Is the load heavy, bulky
or unwieldy? Are its contents likely to shift, is it difficult to grasp, sharp,
hot or otherwise potentially damaging?
When assessing the working environment consider whether space constraints
prevent good posture. Are there uneven, slippery or unstable floor surfaces
and are there variations in floor levels or work surfaces? Is the workplace
poorly lit, noisy, hot, cold or subject to ventilation problems or gusts of
wind? With regard to individual capability; does the task require unusual
strength, height etc. and does it put at risk those who might reasonably be
considered to be pregnant or be suffering from other health problems?
Is it worth it?
If you are still reading you may think it can't possibly
be worth the effort. Rest assured, it is not nearly as daunting as it may
seem and you can be certain that the benefits far outweigh any disadvantages
or time taken. If you wish to explore risk assessment further contact
us at North West Training where you can be sure of the very best advice.

|